2012 Presidential Election

Loading...

Friday, March 20, 2009

2012: Obama versus Palin?


As unfathomable as it seems, there's a decent chance that Sarah Palin becomes the Republican nominee for president in 2012.  The party is in that bad of shape. 

Despite what this silly early poll states, if that matchup ever came to fruition, Obama would anhlliate Sarah Palin by a record margin.  You see, Palin was humiliatingly exposed last fall as being a total ditz/lightweight who appears to have difficulty walking and chewing gum at the same time.

Alas, I don't think even today's GOP voters--or more accurately the Republican primary voters of 2012, could possibly be as stupid to nominate Palin, who makes Dan Quayle look like a Rhoades Scholar.

But wait:  This country re-elected George W. Bush in 2004, right?

Anything is possible.....

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Okay, the party electing Sarah Palin is not in "that bad" of shape, just because she is not afraid to let the public know the truth behind all that the democrats are doing in office doesn't mean she is retarded, she is being honest, unlike Obama, a man who promised less government spending, fewer troops in Iraq, a man who said that he values experience before one applies for a job, well i guess 8 to 10 months in the state legislation is enough experience for him! Why are so many people afraid to have Palin in office? Is everyone watching too much Tina Fey? No i'm not saying that Tina Fey is a bad actress, i actually think she did a good job, however, in her doing so Sarah Palin has been prejudiced against non-stop, what did she do? She took it, like a strong conservative, she didn't cry about it, didn't lose any sleep over it, she showed "strength" in the face of adversity and hate. Now those are some qualities we need in "our" president, not apologies to the world for "our" arrogance.